Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026
Verma Law Associates
Advocates & Legal Consultants
Search
Search
Home
Areas of Practice
Best Criminal Advocate High Court
Banking Law
NDPS Cases-NDPS Advocate in Chandigarh
Intellectual Property Rights
Anoop Verma -Leading & Trusted Advocate High Court Chandigarh
DRT Chandigarh
Legal Updates
Contact Us
Popular Tags
#Criminal Law
#Punjab and Haryana High Court
#Supreme Court
#Advocate Anoop Verma
#Anticipatory Bail
Latest Updates
Prosecution Sanction in India: Section 218 BNSS, Section 19 PC Act and the Law on Prosecuting Public Servants
FIR Under Section 498-A IPC for Offences Committed Abroad: Supreme Court & High Courts Draw a Clear Line on Jurisdiction
At the stage of framing charges, the trial court is not required to evaluate the merits of the case or decide the guilt or innocence of the accused. It only needs to ascertain whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with the trial.
Bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged involvement in a fraudulent property transaction dismissed due to prima facie evidence of financial deception and the petitioner’s criminal history.
Bail granted under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 considering prolonged pre-trial custody, rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act, and judicial precedents emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution.
Home
Judgments and Order
Dispossession under SARFAESI Act, 2002, Stayed by Hon’ble High Court
Judgments and Order
Dispossession under SARFAESI Act, 2002, Stayed by Hon’ble High Court
4 years ago
admin
No Comments
CWP_24747_2022_27_10_2022_INTERIM_ORDER
Download
Share this:
Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
WhatsApp
Share on X (Opens in new window)
X
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Facebook
Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
LinkedIn
Share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
Telegram
Print (Opens in new window)
Print
Like this:
Like
Loading…
Post navigation
Pregnancy Termination-What does Supreme Court Says?
Quashing of FIR on the basis of Compromise.
Leave a Reply
Cancel reply
You must be
logged in
to post a comment.
Related Posts
Criminal Law
Judgments and Order
Marriage Offences
FIR Under Section 498-A IPC for Offences Committed Abroad: Supreme Court & High Courts Draw a Clear Line on Jurisdiction
7 months ago
admin
Articles
Criminal Law
Judgments and Order
Legal News
Legal Remedies
Supreme Court Settles Jurisdiction Under Section 138 NI Act: Payee’s Bank Decides Venue for Account Payee Cheques
10 months ago
admin
Articles
cheque bounce
Judgments and Order
Supreme Court Issues Guidelines under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Advocate in Chandigarh High Court Explains the Latest Ruling on Cheque Dishonour Cases
12 months ago
admin
Articles
cheque bounce
Criminal Law
Judgments and Order
Legal News
Delhi High Court: Security Cheques Issued Under MoU Do Not Constitute Offence Under Section 138 NI Act
12 months ago
admin
%d