Skip to content
  •   Monday, May 18, 2026

Verma Law Associates

Advocates & Legal Consultants

  • Home
  • Areas of Practice
    • Best Criminal Advocate High Court
    • Banking Law
    • NDPS Cases-NDPS Advocate in Chandigarh
    • Intellectual Property Rights
  • DRT Chandigarh
  • Online RTI Application
  • Legal Updates
  • Contact Us
  • Anoop Verma -Leading & Trusted Advocate High Court Chandigarh
Popular Tags
  • #Criminal Law
  • #Punjab and Haryana High Court
  • #Supreme Court
  • #Advocate Anoop Verma
  • #Anticipatory Bail
Latest Updates
FIR Under Section 498-A IPC for Offences Committed Abroad: Supreme Court & High Courts Draw a Clear Line on Jurisdiction
At the stage of framing charges, the trial court is not required to evaluate the merits of the case or decide the guilt or innocence of the accused. It only needs to ascertain whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with the trial.
Bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged involvement in a fraudulent property transaction dismissed due to prima facie evidence of financial deception and the petitioner’s criminal history.
Bail granted under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 considering prolonged pre-trial custody, rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act, and judicial precedents emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution.
Live-in relationships are recognized under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Individuals have the right to live together even outside wedlock
  • Home
  • cheque bounce
  • Stay of Proceedings of Trial going on under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
cheque bounce

Stay of Proceedings of Trial going on under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2 years ago
admin

Prayed for the quashing of complaint pending before the Ld. Magistrate under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Petitioner was the director of the company. Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana after considering the facts of the case and arguments raised by us, stayed the entire proceedings of the trial.

CRM-M_18808_2024_19_04_2024_INTERIM_ORDERDownload
advanoopverma@gmail.com
+91-9463742964
Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
Chandigarh, Chandigarh 160001

Share this:

  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Tags: 138 Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Cheque bounce, Criminal Law, Punjab and Haryana high Court Chandigarh, Stay of Proceedings, Stay of Trial

Post navigation

Got secured one of our clients Anticipatory Bail under sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC, 1860
DK Basu vs. State of West Bengal: A Landmark Judgement on Custodial ViolenceCase: DK Basu vs. State of West Bengal (1997)

Know more

  • Gallery of Judgments/Orders
  • Criminal Law
    • NDPS Cases-NDPS Advocate in Chandigarh
  • Banking Law
  • SARFAESI Act, 2002 Remedies
  • DRT Chandigarh
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • Trademark Registration
  • Copyright Registration
  • Court Marriage in Chandigarh, Matrimonial Lawyer in Chandigarh, One of the best Law Firm in Chandigarh

Recent Posts

  • FIR Under Section 498-A IPC for Offences Committed Abroad: Supreme Court & High Courts Draw a Clear Line on Jurisdiction
  • At the stage of framing charges, the trial court is not required to evaluate the merits of the case or decide the guilt or innocence of the accused. It only needs to ascertain whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with the trial.
  • Bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged involvement in a fraudulent property transaction dismissed due to prima facie evidence of financial deception and the petitioner’s criminal history.
  • Bail granted under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 considering prolonged pre-trial custody, rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act, and judicial precedents emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • Live-in relationships are recognized under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Individuals have the right to live together even outside wedlock

Categories

  • Articles
  • Banking Law
  • cheque bounce
  • Civil Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Judgments and Order
  • Legal News
  • Legal Remedies
  • Marriage Offences
  • Motor Accidents
  • NDPS
  • SARFAESI
  • Service Matters

Related Posts

Articles cheque bounce Judgments and Order

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Advocate in Chandigarh High Court Explains the Latest Ruling on Cheque Dishonour Cases

7 months ago
admin
Articles cheque bounce Criminal Law Judgments and Order Legal News

Delhi High Court: Security Cheques Issued Under MoU Do Not Constitute Offence Under Section 138 NI Act

7 months ago
admin
Articles cheque bounce Legal News

Supreme Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Case for Suppression of Material Facts

9 months ago
admin
Criminal Law Articles cheque bounce Legal News

Power under 406 CrPC to transfer cheque cases from one state to another

3 years ago
admin

Categories

  • Articles (74)
  • Banking Law (5)
    • SARFAESI (5)
  • cheque bounce (7)
  • Civil Law (4)
  • Constitutional Law (3)
  • Criminal Law (70)
    • Marriage Offences (8)
    • NDPS (10)
  • Judgments and Order (33)
  • Legal News (15)
  • Legal Remedies (14)
  • Motor Accidents (2)
  • Service Matters (1)
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
Copyright © All rights reserved | Theme by MantraBrain
%d